American Made Products Directory Available

The American Made Products Directory is sorted by categories of products that are Made in the USA. You can view the listings online and click on one of the many categories. If you are not sure of the correct category we also have items listed alphabetically as well as a search box. If you know of a great company that should be listed here please use the product submit link near the top of the page.

We have worked for years to put together this extensive listing of products made in the USA. Nearly all of the listing on our site are provided at no cost to the company. We also take advertising from companies that are passionate about American made items.

Many of the companies listed in our directory feel American people come above profits at any cost as so many corporations practice today. We have heard from many of the companies on our site that passed up higher margins to keep production here in America.

They often state keeping their manufacturing in the USA allows them much great quality control, lower product to market cost, a much lower carbon foot print and of course jobs for

Americans. Some say you pay more for American Made items and maybe you will, however in the long run you will almost certainly have a better made item made in an labor friendly fashion under environmental laws that protect us all. Most foreign factories operate in ways that would be illegal in the United States.

See the listings….

From AmericaWorking.com –

Taming the Endangered Species Act

The increasing use of the Endangered Species Act by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) places that agency on track to regulate a massive amount of the nation’s land as a habitat for one or more of the listed species and the ones that will be considered in the next few years.

Until now, FWS has been virtually unstoppable in its bid to become land manager of the nation. Recent actions however, have sought to push back on that power play, including a provision in the recent legislation to fund the federal government for 2015 that would prohibit funding for further rules to place sage-grouse on the Endangered Species List. Another attempt comes directly from the local citizens being affected by FWS listings; it is an event that pits man vs. dog.

This story begins with the Utah prairie dog. It lives only in the southwestern corner of Utah, a sparsely populated desert area, a four hour drive from Salt Lake City and consisting mostly of federal lands and two national parks (Zion and Bryce Canyon). The animal is 12 – 14 inches long and weighs up to three pounds. It constantly burrows, leaving parks, backyards, fields, and other public spaces pockmarked with holes and tunnels. There are even tales of it digging in cemeteries during funerals.

As an endangered species, its habitat, including areas that it might someday move to, is protected by the FWS, no matter how much it impacts communities. The population is stable, averaging 35,000. As a concession to farmers, FWS allows them to remove 5000 of these animals from agricultural lands for safety reasons. Everyone else must live with these diggers and must manage their property around them, no matter what the cost or impact, including not being able to develop private property.

Tired of having the little amount of private property available for use in Southwest Utah subject to federal regulatory restrictions, a group of citizens organized a coalition called “People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners” (“PETPO”) to take on the entire machinery of the federal government that protects the Utah prairie dog so it can continue to destroy their property.

PETPO challenged the constitutional authority of the federal government to protect the Utah prairie dog on private land. It argued that the prairie dog does not substantially affect interstate commerce, which is the only constitutional support for federal regulation of these animals. The government countered that even if the prairie dog has no value and no effect on commerce, it can still be regulated because federal regulation of all species has a substantial effect on commerce. In short, the government argues all regulation is constitutional because the purpose of regulation is to affect commerce.

Most of the time courts give deference to agency decisions, but in this case, the court ruled that the proper constitutional focus must be on the regulated activity not the fact that the government’s regulation impacts commerce. It reasoned that if the regulated activity impacts national markets, the federal government has the power to regulate. But if the regulated activity (in this case the Utah prairie dog) has no impact on national markets, the federal government does not have the power to regulate.

In applying the law to the facts, the court found in favor of PETPO because the Utah prairie dog lives only in southwestern Utah and its diminution would not significantly alter the supply or quantity of animals for which there is a national market.

What is most significant about this case is that the purpose of the Endangered Species Act is to protect ecosystems and on this point the court found that just the protection of an ecosystem may not be sufficient impact on commerce to be constitutional under the commerce clause….

By William Kovacs – Fox News –

Those Ungovernable Colonists

The American colonies must have been an unruly place, full as they were of religious fanatics and slave traders, second sons and fortune hunters, criminals and former political prisoners, and all manner of people in between. The first settlements hugged the coast, where one set of adventurers looked seaward while another looked to the interior wilderness. It was, in retrospect, almost inevitable that North America would quickly become the wealthiest place in the world by the 17th century.

Why? Because those seditionists, fanatics, and gamblers were impossible to rule. While we are counting our blessings this Thanksgiving, let’s not forget to count that one: Our ancestors did not much like being told what to do, and we — and the world — are immeasurably richer and happier for that.

Edmund Burke called the Crown’s attitude toward the colonies “wise and salutary neglect,” but it was as much pragmatism as it was policy. There were many colonies and colonists, they were not of a uniformly obedient type, they were far away — and, most important, they were extraordinarily productive. By the latter half of the 18th century, there were more iron forges in the American colonies than in Britain, the colonies were exporting millions of barrels of flour and tons of other agriculture products, and one out of three ships in the British merchant fleet was American-built. The economy was booming, and most of the population still lived in rural or semi-rural areas, far from the amusements of urban life, which may explain….

By Kevin D. Williamson – National Review Online –

CAN WE STILL RECOGNIZE AMERICA?

During the time leading up to the Revolutionary War the American people were very restricted in many areas of how they lived and how they did business. Before the Revolutionary War it was illegal to print a Bible in the Colonies. All Bibles had to be shipped in from England. The reason for this was the King did not want a version of the Geneva Bible printed in the Colonies. That Bible did not hold the king in the position that he wanted to be in and that was supreme ruler, almost a god. It was a situation where the king decided what you needed to know concerning the Christian religion. The importance the Geneva Bible to the Pilgrims and the Founders can be explained.

To understand it here is a bit of history of the Geneva Bible: “It is important that we spend a little time looking at why America was such a desired place to go during this time. America had begun to establish a society that was freer than any other nation in the world. That society was being built on the teachings of the new Geneva Bible. Up until the Geneva Bible no Bible was available in the English language nor were there any commentaries to explain many aspects of the teachings found in scripture. The Bible had just begun to be translated into the English language. The New Testament was first printed in 1526 by William Tyndale. In the process of translating it he was forced to flee England because of persecution from the Crown. He fled to Germany and then to Belgium before finishing the translation. Six thousand copies were smuggled into England and that caused Tyndale to be hunted down and imprisoned. Then on March 6, 1536 he was strangled and burned at the stake, all for printing the New Testament in the English language.

It was in 1553 during the reign of ‘Bloody Mary’ Tudor when the English were pushed to return to Roman Catholicism. She ordered the burning of all copies of the Bibles in English and caused more than 300 reformers, pastors and Bible translators to be burned at the stake. This caused about 800 English scholars to leave England, for safety reasons, and they gathered in Geneva culminating in the grouping of the finest theologians and Biblical scholars in the world at that time. There between 1557 and 1560 they began to translate the entire Bible into the English language. In the Geneva Bible were footnotes and commentaries from John Calvin, Thomas Sternhold, John Hopkins, William Whittingham, Miles Coverdale, John Knox and many more. These commentaries infuriated King James because they began to teach against a monarchy and totalitarian rule, supported individual freedoms, property ownership and many other things that took power and authority away from the king so in 1606 he ordered that a Bible without notes and commentaries be made available for him. This became the King James Version we have today.

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to be completely translated to English from the original language.”[1] (Emphasis mine throughout) These commentaries talked about having men who feared God in places of authority, owning property, and individual freedoms. From this we can see that it was this Bible that began to build the fire for liberty in the hearts and minds of not just the Pilgrims but kept that fire burning all the way to the Founders and beyond. It was said that that the key liberties that were in the Declaration of Independence had been preached from the pulpits of America since the early 1600’s.

When America was beginning to be established the Pilgrims began to experience liberties that were unknown to the common person in the world at that time. One could pursue the vocation that he was interested in. In Europe there was still a strong cast system and what your father did you did whether you wanted to or not. This freedom was built the foundation for the greatest free market system the world had ever seen.

One could worship as one believed was the manner in which he believed best. In England the Church of England was the prominent church. You paid taxes that supported the church and the government dictated the doctrines of the church. In America you could worship freely and the pastors were free to preach the uncompromised Word of God. This exposed the inhabitants of America to a way of life that was not known anywhere else in the world.

By Pastor Roger Anghis – NewsWithViews.com –

The Lie Machine

By Paul Craig Robert – A Nation Beguiled –

I have come to the conclusion that the West is a vast lie machine for the secret agendas of vested interests. Consider, for example, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Transpacific Trade and Investment Partnership.

These so-called “partnerships” are in fact vehicles by which US corporations make themselves immune to the sovereign laws of foreign countries in which they do business. A sovereign country that attempts to enforce its laws against an American corporation can be sued by the corporation for “restraint of trade.” For example, if Monsanto wants to sell GMO seeds in France or US corporations wish to sell genetically-modified foods in France, and France enforces its laws against GMOs, the Transatlantic Trade Partnership allows France to be sued in jurisdictions outside the courts of France for “restraint of trade.” In other words, preventing the entry into France of a prohibited product constitutes restraint of trade.

This is the reason that the US has insisted that the Transatlantic and Transpacific Partnerships be totally secretive and negotiated outside the democratic process. Not even the US Congress has been permitted knowledge of the negotiations.

Obviously, the Europeans and Asians who are agreeing with the terms of these “partnerships” are the bought-and-paid-for agents of the US corporations. If the partnerships go through, the only law in Europe and Asia will be US law. The European and Asian government officials who agree to the hegemony of US corporations over the laws of their countries will be so handsomely paid that they could enter the realm of the One Percent.

It is interesting to compare the BBC’s coverage (October 10) with that of RT (October 11). The BBC reports that the aim of the Transatlantic Partnership is to remove “barriers to bilateral commerce” and to stimulate more trade and investment, economic growth and employment. The BBC does not report that the removal of barriers includes barriers against GMO products.

Everyone knows that the European Commission is corrupt. Who would be surprised if its members hope to be enriched by the American corporations? Little wonder the European Commission declared that concerns that the Transatlantic partnership would impact the sovereignty of countries is misplaced.

 
Continue Reading